When people think of green buildings, they think of renewable energy, recycling and low flow shower heads, but surprisingly few think of architecture. However, proper architectural planning can play one of the largest roles in the reduction of waste and the carbon footprint of a building. It may also enjoy immediate as well and long term cost savings.

Even before the foundation of a building is laid, a carbon footprint has formed. Much of a carbon footprint can be attributed to energy expenditures related to the transportation and manufacturing processes, which not only add pollution to the environment, but in some cases, additional cost to a project.

It is not uncommon for builders and developers to expect to pay an up front premium when they make the decision to equip any new project with energy efficient and environmentally friendly technology.   If asked about why they accept this premium, many builders state a variety of motivations ranging from the realization of long term savings, a desire to achieve LEED certification or out of a sincere commitment to environmental protection.  However, there are even more reasons why going green really pays.

Still, many stereotypes stand in the way of greater adoption of eco-friendly development. Common consensus holds that green projects may have up to 18% higher up front expenses when compared to standard buildings with little to no energy efficiency improvements. This, in fact, is completely false. Most projects aiming to achieve LEED certification may only have to spend an additional 1% or perhaps not even that much.